their habitat and so forth. It does not give people the right to abuse animals just because they are lesser than. I would also concede that there are certain parts of the world that should not be the site of development

businesses and so forth. There is a place for nature reserves

zoos and other untouched land. The animals should be allowed to survive and thrive rather than have their habitat destroyed. Im just a little concern about the absolutist language that is seen on both extremes of the argument. Its true that non-human animals should not be completely disregarded. However

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
I know that many have the argument that a non-human animals life is just as valuable as a human just doesnt ring true for me. This is not to suggest that humans should have complete and unfettered dominion over animals
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay